< Previous: Using closures as parameters when they return values | Next: Closures with multiple parameters > |
We just made a travel()
function. It accepts one parameter, which is a closure that itself accepts one parameter and returns a string. That closure is then run between two calls to print()
.
Here’s that in code:
func travel(action: (String) -> String) {
print("I'm getting ready to go.")
let description = action("London")
print(description)
print("I arrived!")
}
We can call travel()
using something like this:
travel { (place: String) -> String in
return "I'm going to \(place) in my car"
}
However, Swift knows the parameter to that closure must be a string, so we can remove it:
travel { place -> String in
return "I'm going to \(place) in my car"
}
It also knows the closure must return a string, so we can remove that:
travel { place in
return "I'm going to \(place) in my car"
}
As the closure only has one line of code that must be the one that returns the value, so Swift lets us remove the return
keyword too:
travel { place in
"I'm going to \(place) in my car"
}
Swift has a shorthand syntax that lets you go even shorter. Rather than writing place in
we can let Swift provide automatic names for the closure’s parameters. These are named with a dollar sign, then a number counting from 0.
travel {
"I'm going to \($0) in my car"
}
SPONSORED Play is the first native iOS design tool created for designers and engineers. You can install Play for iOS and iPad today and sign up to check out the Beta of our macOS app with SwiftUI code export. We're also hiring engineers!
Sponsor Hacking with Swift and reach the world's largest Swift community!
Link copied to your pasteboard.