< When should you use willSet rather than didSet? | Why do we need to mark some methods as mutating? > |
Updated for Xcode 12.5
Swift’s functions let us name a piece of functionality and run it repeatedly, and Swift’s methods do much the same thing, so what’s the difference?
Honestly, the only real difference is that methods belong to a type, such as structs, enums, and classes, whereas functions do not. That’s it – that’s the only difference. Both can accept any number of parameters, including variadic parameters, and both can return values. Heck, they are so similar that Swift still uses the func
keyword to define a method.
Of course, being associated with a specific type such as a struct means that methods gain one important super power: they can refer to the other properties and methods inside that type, meaning that you can write a describe()
method for a User
type that prints the user’s name, age, and city.
There is one more advantage to methods, but it’s quite subtle: methods avoid namespace pollution. Whenever we create a function, the name of that function starts to have meaning in our code – we can write wakeUp()
and have it do something. So, if you write 100 functions you end up with 100 reserved names, and if you write 1000 functions you have 1000 reserved names.
That can get messy quickly, but by putting functionality into methods we restrict where those names are available – wakeUp()
isn’t a reserved name any more unless we specifically write someUser.wakeUp()
. This reduces the so-called pollution, because if most of our code is in methods then we won’t get name clashes by accident.
SPONSORED Emerge helps iOS devs write better, smaller apps by profiling binary size on each pull request and surfacing insights and suggestions. Companies using Emerge have reduced the size of their apps by up to 50% in just the first day. Built by a team with years of experience reducing app size at Airbnb.
Sponsor Hacking with Swift and reach the world's largest Swift community!
Link copied to your pasteboard.